Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Getting It Right

If you're a regular reader, you know I've played baseball, I've coached it, and I still enjoy watching it. Purists groaned when baseball introduced the "instant replay" and "challenges" a couple of seasons ago. The same thing happened in professional football, but it seems to have worked.

I've always respected umpires. They do a tough job, and seem to do it well. Oh, there are times I think they really blew a call, but they're getting better about asking another umpire, who might have had a better view of the play, for help. But I wonder how often a call of theirs is challenged and overturned.

The only figures I was able to find were for the season just concluded in the fall of 2014. At that time, when replays were reviewed because of challenges initiated by managers or questions from the umpires themselves, about half of the questioned calls were overturned. That sounds like a lot--but consider that the home plate umpire calls balls and strikes about 250 times a game (and these aren't subject to challenge). The umpires on the bases make calls over 50 times (and these usually can be questioned). So, on balance, maybe the umpires don't do such a bad job.

I complain from time to time (big surprise). But when I stop to consider the matter, maybe the things about which I'm complaining go as they should most of the time.

How about you? Would you like to have an "instant replay" of some things in your life? Do you think  the faceless entities like the phone and power companies about which we complain don't do such a bad job? What's your opinion?

Tweet with a single click: "Would instant replay in your life make a difference?" Click here to tweet.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Writing: Different Strokes...

I guess I'm dating myself, but I was around when this saying was popular: "Different strokes for different folks." There are a lot of ways to apply that, but today I'd like to apply it to writing...and reading.

Writers hear about "rules" and "suggestions" that, if we follow them, are almost guaranteed to produce a best-seller. But the more I learn as I travel this road to writing, the more convinced I am that it's possible to ignore rules provided the final product is one readers enjoy.

One of the things about which we're warned is being unclear with our phrasing. Consider these two paragraphs:

A) Roger Leonides had been in London on the day of his father's death at Box House, the headquarters of Associated Catering.

B) On the day of his father's death, Roger Leonides had been in London at Box House, the headquarters of Associated Catering.

Which is clearer to you? The problem with A) is that it implies that the father died at Box House, whereas B) seems to more accurately depict what happened. Which is which? A) was taken from Crooked House, a classic by Agatha Christie that the Saturday Review of Literature called "a knockout." B is my own version.

Which one sold multiple thousands of copies? Yeah, that's right. Crooked House went through nine editions in English, not to mention something like thirteen in various foreign languages.

So, what do you think? What rules or suggestions do you think are important? Or does it really matter?

Tweet with a single click. "What writing rules are really important? Or are any of them?" Click here to tweet.

(PS--For those who didn't notice, the man in the picture above is wearing shoes of two different colors--different strokes).

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Summer

Sunday was the first official day of summer. Of course, summer's been here for several weeks, but now it's official. Summer means different things to different people. For workers, summer is a time to look forward with anticipation (or possibly dread) to a vacation. For  school children, it means no studying, no tests, no teachers--unless they're in summer school. For some people, it means the weather will be hotter when they engage in their favorite outdoor activity.

What are your plans for this summer? Leave a comment and tell us.

Tweet with a single click: "Summer is officially here. What are your plans?" Click here to tweet.

Note: The Suspense Sisters review site today addresses Fatal Trauma. If you'd like to read what the reviewer has to say and leave a comment, click here.

Monday, June 22, 2015

And The Winner Is...

Thanks to all of you who've entered the Perfect Prescription Prize Pack Giveaway, helping me celebrate the release of my latest medical thriller, Fatal Trauma. In case you've forgotten, the prize consists of:

  • A $25 cash card
  • A copy of Fatal Trauma
  • A bag of coffee (because caffeine can cure a lot)
  • A medical-inspired coffee mug
  • Syringe pens
  • A box of medical-inspired cookies (because sugar can cure what caffeine doesn’t)
And the winner is Stephanie Halcomb. 

Congratulations to Stephanie. The folks at LitFuse will email you shortly.

I'd like to express my appreciation to LitFuse Group and my publisher, Abingdon Press, for putting all this together. And thanks to all of you for playing. Stay tuned to this site for tomorrow's regular post.

Oh--it won't be long before the release of my next novel, Miracle Drug. Watch for it in September.

Friday, June 19, 2015

Writing: Dr. Harry Kraus on Pseudonyms and Genre Switch

NOTE: Yes, enough people left comments on my recent post for me to give away a book. Click the highlighted link above to see the question. The random selection process has settled on Shirley D, and her signed copy of Fatal Trauma is on its way. Thanks to all who commented.

Dr. Harry Kraus is a talented surgeon, an excellent writer, and a committed Christian, and I'm proud to call him both colleague and friend. He recently posted on his own blog about his experiment writing under a pseudonym in a different genre. I've asked Harry to tell us about his experiences in that regard.

Harry, tell us about your “River Hays experiment?” What did you do, and why?

I had several stories that I wanted to tell in an authentic way, but to do that would  involve adult situations that would offend some of my more conservative Christian readers. For example, the first "River Hayes" novel involved a back-story about the use of female slaves in America (prior to the Civil War) for sex. This was a common practice. I wanted to tell the story about Thomas Jefferson and his relationship with a slave, Sally Hemmings, a female who was a slave, yet a half-sister to Thomas's wife, Martha. I've read other novel accounts about the relationship of Jefferson to his slave and I don't buy the romanticized version. Sally was never on equal footing with this powerful, older, white man. Yes, she bore him children, but she was 15 years old when he began to use her for sex. The telling of this story demanded more graphic content which I was afraid would offend Kraus readers.

What’s your opinion as to why this failed? If you had it to do again, would you do it differently? 

It failed for numerous reasons. The first is that the books don't seem to fall neatly in one genre. My books appeal to women, but are not classic "women's fiction." My books are part thriller, part romance, and part historical. At the first reading, my agent called it "brilliant."  But alas, she's been unable to sell the manuscripts. A second reason is the tightening of publishers's belts in the new era of e-publishing. This makes publishers a bit more reluctant to take a chance on a new writer. Granted, I'm not a new novelist, but I was trying to win new readers without my Kraus name. A third reason is that my writing was not literary enough to be called "literary," but not plot driven fiction or genre-driven enough to be pop fiction.

You’ve had novels released by a traditional publisher, which would make you a “hybrid author” should you decide to self-publish. Do you think that “indie-publishing” might be a valid option in your case? 

I am currently planning on revising the manuscripts to take out any offensive language or adult content while trying to preserve the needed story content. I will put the stories out myself on Kindle under my name. The first, One Drop of Me is the story I mentioned above. It takes its title from the fact that it only takes one drop of black blood to make a person a slave for life.  The second, The Scar Thief, is the story of a plastic surgeon who has a love for erasing the congenital scars of her young patients. If only she could deal with her own! The third novel is the story of an American surgeon in Iraq who falls in love with an Iraqi woman from within the context of the battle of Fallujah. It is entitled Between the Gods and Men. The title refers to an esteemed place where some surgeons think they live (NOT you, Richard) and to the crazy place where battle surgeons find themselves: literally standing in the way of life and death for so many.

What’s your assessment of the current state of publishing? Do you see changes in the present state of the publishing world?

Certainly e-publishing is having a huge impact. Publishers are gun shy of taking risks. Quality is suffering in much of the indie book world. I'm not sure how all of this will play out, but I'm confident that readers will continue to have great material to enjoy and that the best novels have not yet been written!


Harry, thanks for telling us about your experiences. The arguments continue about traditional vs. independent publishing and the current state of the industry. Stay tuned for more.

Meanwhile, my question for my blog readers is this: Do you think the author's name on a book guarantees a certain type of content? Should writers use a pseudonym if they write in a different genre? Let me know in the comments.

Tweet with a single click: "Is an author's name a promise of sorts for a certain type of book?"  Click here to tweet.